The First American Corporation / Annual Report 2001
notes to consolidated financial statements
NOTE 17
Litigation:
On May 19, 1999, the state of California, the controller and
insurance commissioner of the state of California filed a class
action suit in the state court in Sacramento. Initially, the action
sought to certify as a class of defendants all title and escrow
companies doing business in California from 1970 to the
present, including certain of the Company’s subsidiaries. The
plaintiffs allege that the defendants: failed to give unclaimed
property to the state of California on a timely basis; charged
California home buyers and other escrow customers fees for
services that were never performed or which cost less than the
amount charged; and devised and carried out schemes, known
as earnings credits, with financial institutions to receive interest
on escrow funds deposited by defendants with financial
institutions in demand deposits.
Since the initial filing of the suit, the California attorney
general’s office, on behalf of the state, the controller and the
insurance commissioner, indicated that it would not seek to
certify a class of defendants, but would instead amend its suit
to name an unspecified number of title underwriters and
underwritten title companies. To date, the attorney general
has neither amended the suit nor, to the Company’s knowledge,
taken steps to progress with it, including the service of process
on any party. The attorney general, however, has entered into
settlement discussions with various title insurance underwriters,
including certain of the Company’s subsidiaries. No settlement
agreements have been signed and certain material terms
remain under discussion. Additionally, the attorney general
has decided that all issues pertaining to escheat obligations
will be dealt with through routine audits conducted by the
controller’s office, rather than through the litigation filed by
the attorney general.
Subsequent to the filing of this lawsuit, First American Title
Insurance Company, a subsidiary of the Company, was named
and served as a defendant in two private class actions in
California courts. The allegations in those actions include some,
but not all, of the allegations contained in the lawsuit discussed
above. The private class actions independently seek injunctive
relief, attorneys’ fees, damages and penalties in unspecified
amounts. One of the private class actions has been dismissed.
Counsel for the remaining class action has engaged in settlement
discussions with the Company’s subsidiaries in an effort to
resolve the class action at the same time and on similar terms
as a resolution of the action filed by the attorney general. No
settlement agreements have been signed and certain material
terms remain under discussion.
The Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution
of these actions will have a material adverse effect on its financial
condition or results of operations.
The Company is involved in numerous routine legal
proceedings related to its operations. While the ultimate
disposition of each proceeding is not determinable, the
Company does not believe that any of such proceedings will
have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or
results of operations.